example.com/path/to/article
000 points · username · 0 hours ago
example.com0 points · 0 comments · 10 years ago · beefman
pvaldes
Mikeb85
I for one welcome growing things of value in the city, not just lawns and decorative plants (which the animals - rabbits and deer here - eat anyway but people don't)
tiredwired
refurb
I think the trees are these: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbutus_unedo
misja111
Because all the fuss about insecticides and other chemical detergents in the bio industry in the last couple of decades, the food industry has done a lot to ensure that most of the chemicals are gone once the fruits are in the supermarket. Sure, it could still be better. But it is a lot better than a fruit tree that has been sucking up air pollution during its entire life.
Here is some more background: http://www.thewire.com/national/2011/06/ways-urban-gardening...
Other problem is that this trees lose aesthetic value and health. This can sound silly, but good trees are expensive, and a mishappen tree that only have good flowers in the 50% and with stems that break or touch the soil by the load of the fruit in a narrow street will be chopped.
But if we think a little about it, to have fruit trees in suitable areas is common sense and an ancient culture of sharing that is lost now. Those trees were invaluable life-savers at war times in Europe, for example. The place for fruit trees is in a park, where you just don't care if there is some fruit around the tree, not in a narrow street.