275 points · 93 comments · 1 month ago · rebane2001
lyra.horseDylan16807
mbreese
dmitrygr
senfiaj
notpushkin
Completely unrelated but somehow unsurprising:
Zero-day CSS: CVE-2026-2441 exists in the wild - https://smackernews.com/item/47062748 HN - February 2026 (233 comments)
btdmaster
I see CSS random() is only supported by Safari, I wonder if there's some side channel that would work in Chrome specifically? (I guess timing the user input would work)
RedShift1
BirAdam
freakynit
CSS should NOT be becoming turing complete. Nor any other DSL.
csmantle
ebolyen
I'm curious to know what you would rate as the most important features to make this work? It seems like calc+if do a lot of the heavy lifting, but the new function syntax is what makes instruction lookup tractable.
andrewstuart
Also: wow.
namuol
I get the feeling some people just hate the web.
hudecekdev
voidUpdate
randfur
Aloha
MetaMonk
warpspin
nottorp
_s_a_m_
NoiseBert69
Can it mine bitcoins or run worms?
desdenova
gurjeet
Your browser is unable to run this demo. Please try with an up-to-date Chromium-based browser.
Sorry to see internet regressing to Internet Explorer days.
Edited to add: This is the message I get when using Firefox.
nsonha
A hover-based clock, such as the one in Jane Ori's CPU Hack, is fast and stable, but requires you to hold your mouse on the screen, which some people claim does not count as turing complete for whatever reason, so I wanted this demo to be fully functional with zero user input.
That hover clock post is from 2023 and the "some people claim does not count" post is 2022. They were probably talking about the ones that make you check thousands of boxes to drive the logic forward.
Anyway, very cool advancement.