One takeaway from this is that anthropic do not want their public-facing model to be good at advanced ML research.

With that incentive it seems reasonable to assume that future anthropic models will not be good at ML research, at least because they aren't incentivised to make it so, and therefore using other models perhaps open source will be the way to go.

This does make the large assumption that they can afford to train a parallel model for themselves to assist in their own research. But given their huge valuation, and incentives, that extra cost is feasibly worth it for them.

I think I've seen this model used by major academic publishers before.: https://files.catbox.moe/mrh1ll.jpg

It's kinda weird to think the Chinese AI labs might be more trust worthy than the US labs.

- Anthropic is ran by a bunch of nut jobs.

- OpenAI is ran by a guy you can't trust.

I don't even know if we should include DeepMind, Meta, or xAi in the conversation of AI labs at this point since they can't produce models better than Chinese labs.

The damage is done. They designed Fable to be dishonest and sabotage-y. Look at this report of Claude now randomly changing AI software without being asked to:

https://xcancel.com/hammer_mt/status/2064839924398825798

This is so completely dishonest. But it also shows how deeply anti competitive Anthropic is. They will talk about safety but it’s not actually about safety: building features like this seems intended to hurt competition in the AI space. They don’t mind if AI helps YOUR competitor but if it means competition for them, they suddenly have a problem with it.

I don’t care that they walked this back. They’ve shown who they are. And what they’re capable of.

Call me a cynic, but I don't believe this is a genuine change of heart at all. It feels much more like a panicked response to something that might undermine their IPO.

Even if you trust Anthropic today (which I don't), they clearly don't want competition and there's no telling what other shady moves they'll pull in future.

The only sustainable way forward is to support open models. I was already on the fence about whether or not to keep my Max subscription (the extra cost over something like DeepSeek V4 didn't really feel justifiable). This is the tipping point for me, I'll be cancelling my sub before it renews at the end of the month.

Too late.

We now all know that Anthropic CAN do that if they want to. The fact that they told you upfront about it shows that their arrogance on this self-sabotage against their customers is at stratospheric levels.

Believe them the first time, and they are not your friends at all.

Great, now just let me use it for bioinformatics and we're good.