example.com/path/to/article
000 points · username · 0 hours ago
example.com120 points · 125 comments · 16 days ago · MC995
phyzome
fau
This is necessary as (a) the 5h limit allows us to smoothen the load on our compute, allowing to keep the plan generous in terms of weekly usage
Seems fair, but then maybe the 5h usage should also drain slower during off-peak hours? Perhaps it already does.
and (b) users on the Plus plan are relatively casual and new users, but then also just accidentally eat through their whole weeks usage and then are confused, making it not a great experience.
Wouldn't this one be fixed by making the 5h limit a guardrail you can opt out of? If so, then this doesn't work as justification for a mandatory limit.
LaurensBER
At this point the 40 USD/120 USD Cursor Team subscription suddenly becomes a lot more attractive. You'll get more generous limits and a single monthly limit.
flimflamm
OsrsNeedsf2P
LetMeLogin
danielpassy
benmorris
harrisoned
Tighter limits, forcing people to higher plans. Most will go as they are addicted and dependent on those tools. They need to use to finish the project they started as no human will touch that pile of code. If you didn't saw this coming, as it has been the standard business strategy from all kinds of SaaS in the last years, you haven't been paying attention.
datakan
F7F7F7
I don’t mind the 5 hour window but this is a reminder to not hinge your workflows on any one tool.
dgellow
hemkeshr
pankaj4u4m
honestlyranked
Alifatisk
mostertoaster
kylecorpin
rrr_oh_man
sowrabh
tarr11
rfgplk
m3kw9
janilowski
hno8a34nwn
BrucecarlL
q8zd3
Such a casino vibe.