example.com/path/to/article
000 points · username · 0 hours ago
example.com498 points · 245 comments · 19 days ago · teekert
teekertOP
20k
The idea that they'll steal from everyone except you is just wishful thinking
rectang
Microsoft already did a rug pull on me and opted me in to training months after I signed up with Github Copilot. It exhausting and ultimately futile to monitor these companies.
It's not guaranteed that Duck.ai will continue to uphold its promise of not training on your sessions — if the company gets bought by Microsoft, it's only a matter of time before the switch to "you can opt out at any time". But since privacy is Duck.ai's brand, it will be somewhat harder for them to hide what they're doing should they betray their customers.
I also don't actually trust that Duck.ai sub-vendors OpenAI and Anthropic will uphold whatever contract they have with Duck.ai — the whole AI business model is built on lawless consumption of others work.
We'll ultimately have to run our own models locally, because it's impractical to defend against untrustworthy AI vendors.
saaaaaam
The page title is "Can I opt out of my input or output data being used for training".
Right at the top of the page it says "In certain cases, your input and output data (such as conversations, documents, and other user-provided content) may be included in Mistral’s model training programs. You retain full control over this processing and have the right to opt out of these programs at any time."
maz1b
dang
We've changed it to the article title now per https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.
thoughtpeddler
segmondy
matthieu_bl
Service: Vibe Plan: Non-Enterprise Default: Opted in Opt-out possible? Yes
Service: Vibe Plan: Enterprise Default: Opted out Opt-out possible? Yes (admin-managed)
Service: Mistral Studio/API Plan: Not specified Default: Not stated, I assume opted in Opt-out possible? Yes
munksbeer
But the individual level moral perspective confuses me. You object to your own input being used for training "for free", but you're ok to use models which already slurped the data of millions of other people "for free"?
I don't get it. Obviously this is going to be a controversial take on here (I am not blind to the sentiment), so, please help me understand. If you're a conscientious objector, why are you using the models in the first place?
maxdo
[deleted]
tensor
olejorgenb
In the Admin panel[links to the admin panel], open the Privacy menu in the left-hand navigation bar.
Why not link to the https://admin.mistral.ai/plateforme/privacy panel directly
zelphirkalt
Noaidi
https://alterlab.io/blog/how-to-give-your-ai-agent-access-to...
So no more data for them. No more social media, no more cloud storage, just no more.
It's been fun, but I am smarter than AI, so bye.
Lucasoato
rezonant
Regarding the former, there's no normal Copy button so presumably this just copies the content of the article. Not sure why it needs to be clarified that its for LLMs.
f6v
__MatrixMan__
I just wish I could force them to share it with their competitors also.
creativeSlumber
Vibe: users are not opted out by default
Vibe (Enterprise): customers are opted out of training by default
So they made it opt in for enterprise (how it should be), but intentionally made opt out for regular user.Basically saying "screw you: to regular users.
Any self respecting user should stop using them.
Diti
I think I will be using Kagi Ultimate for the inference UI, so the data is somewhat anonymized before being collected.
sbinnee
TZubiri
if you sign the contract (click I agree on Terms of Service), and it says that they do not train on the data, by what right can they backtrack on that?
Maybe it is assumed that they notified you and you have the right to terminate the contract? Relying on some clause where the contract can be updated at any time. Or terminated at any time (with the presumption that a clause change is a termination and an automatic signing of the new contract, but that's weak)
selicos
vb-8448
htrp
This is them just making it very clear and disclosing as per European rules.
bigbuppo
lukeschlather
Of course with Claude and so on this bothers me too, but it doesn't seem like there's any real recourse under US law. But I would hope that "oh you shouldn't enter PII" isn't going to cut it under European law, that if I say "don't store my prompts, they include PII I don't want you storing" should be sufficient here under the GDPR and Mistral shouldn't be able to just store it anyway.
threecheese
Edit: Does “use for training” include “we store all your chat logs forever tied to your identity”?
perks_12
croes
users are not opted out by default
Of course because you can’t be opt out by default that would be called opt in.
xtiansimon
_blackhawk_
DanielHall
daRealDodo
scotty79
danelski
romanovcode
krunck
EFLKumo
ylisav
amelius
xyst
Got to love the private equity parasites ruining everything for the sake of profit.
moffkalast
ex1fm3ta
LoveMistral
DerDerDaIst
r_lee
you can't make this shit up
For some time these pages conflicted with what our users reported (they said that in contrast to what I stated to our management they found they were opted into training on prompts by default as per their own privacy page). Mistral just now corrected their docs. I'm not sure how long the conflicting situation has lasted, but at least for several days.
For contrast: Claude disables training on prompts for organizations starting from the 18 euro tier [0]. As a European I'm disappointed.
[0] https://claude.com/pricing#team-&-enterprise